NCP Norway handles complaints against companies operating in and from Norway.
The process is non-judicial. NCP Norway provides a platform for dialogue and mediation between the parties, assisting them in efforts to find solutions that are in keeping with the Guidelines and NCP Norway’s procedures.
Ongoing specific instances
When the Contact Point receives a complaint, the company complained against will be offered the opportunity to provide a response. The Contact Point will then make an initial assessment, based on specific criteria, of whether the the issue raised warrants further examination. This assessment will be published within three months of receipt of the complaint.
If the NCP concludes to take the issue raised into consideration, the parties will be offered dialogue and mediation, with the aim of reaching an agreement on how to resolve the matter. This may form the basis for an agreement or a joint statement from the parties. If the parties do not reach an agreement, NCP Norway will investigate the matter. In both cases, the matter will be concluded with a public final statement from the NCP, which will be published within 18 months of receipt of the complaint. In complex cases or in the event of unforeseen events, this may take longer.
The parties undertake to maintain confidentiality during the period of dialogue and mediation. The same applies to the mediators and the NCP until the final statement is published
Mapuche-Williche vs Statkraft AS in Chile
The complainants claim that Statkraft AS has not acted in line with the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises on Responsible Business Conduct when it comes to risk-based due diligence assessments, with particular emphasis on inadequate involvement of indigenous peoples with regard to land rights, environmental aspects and religious traditions in connection with the development of hydroelectric power plants in the Pilmaiquén watershed in southern Chile.
Completed specific instances
The NCP will publish the result along with the accompanying documentation after a specific instance is closed.
SOMO on behalf of 474 CSOs in Myanmar vs. Telenor ASA
Alleged lack of due diligence, stakeholder engagement and transparency in connection with Telenor’s withdrawal from Myanmar. Received in 2021 and final statement published in 2025.
Individual vs Orkla Latvia / Orkla Snacks
The complaint was filed in 2025 by a former employee and concerns workplace harassment, whistleblowing systems and production standards. The contact point decided not to accept the case for further consideration.
Individual vs Telenor Pakistan / Telenor ASA
The complaint was filed in 2025 by a former employee of Telenor Pakistan, and concerns issues related to a bonus scheme for employees. The NCP concluded to not accept the case for further consideration.
Individual vs Crayon Group Holding ASA
Complaint received in 2025 from former employee regarding alleged discrimination and harassment in the workplace at a subsidiary abroad. The contact point decided to not accept the case for further consideration.
PAX and others vs. Aker BP ASA and Aker ASA
Alleged lack of due diligence related to human rights, stakeholder dialogue and redress in connection with a merger. Received in 2022, mediation ended without agreement and the Contact Point’s final statement was published in 2025.
IUF, EFFAT-IUF, SEIU and UGT vs. NBIM
Allegation of gender-based violence and harassment at McDonald’s. The complaint concerns the due diligence of two investors, including NBIM. Received in 2020 and the parties reached an agreement that was published together with the NCP’s final statement in 2022.
Committee Seeking Justice for Alethankyaw (CSJA) vs. Telenor
The complaint concerned an incident in Telenor Myanmar, where the military allegedly used a mobile phone mast to shoot at unarmed people. Alleged lack of due diligence. Received in 2019 and concluded with the NCP’s final statement in 2022.
Workers Support Team and KTNC Watch vs. TotalEnergies EP Norge, Equinor and Technip Energies
Alleged non-compliance with OECD guidelines following an accident during the construction of an oil platform for the Martin Linge field. Received in 2019 and concluded with the NCP’s follow-up report in 2024.
Industri Energi vs DNO ASA II
Allegation of violation of Yemeni law and that DNO has operated with poorer conditions for employees, compared to similar employers in Yemen. Received in 2018, and concluded with the NCP’s final statement in 2020.
Industri Energi vs DNO
Alleged lack of dialogue between DNO and employee representatives in Yemen, in connection with the closure of operations in 2015. Received in 2016 and concluded with the Final Statement in 2018.
FIVAS vs Norconsult AS/NorPower Sdn Bhd
Allegation that Norcosult’s involvement in a dam project in Malaysia is not in accordance with OECD guidelines. Received 2014 and closed with a Follow-up Statement in 2016.
Jijnjevaerie Saami Village vs. Statkraft AS
Allegation that a planned wind power project will affect the ability to make a living from reindeer herding. Received in 2012 and concluded with a Final Statement, followed by an agreement betwen the parties in 2016.
Cotton Campaign, Anti-Slavery International and KTNC Watch vs NBIM
The complaint concerns allegations of child and forced labor in the supply chain of two companies in which the Government Pension Fund Global (NBIM) has investments. Received in 2014 and concluded with a Final Statement in 2015.
United Steel Workers (USW) og Birlesik Metal IS vs. NBIM
Påstått brudd på arbeidstakerrettigheter i et nordamerikansk selskap der Statens pensjonsfond utland (NBIM) har investeringer. Mottatt 2014 og avsluttet med slutterklæring i 2015.
FIVH vs. Intex Resources ASA
Påstand om mangelfulle konsultasjoner med berørte urfolk, korrupsjon og framtidige miljøødeleggelser i forbindelse med planlagt gruvedrift på Fillipinene. Mottatt i 2009 og avluttet med slutterklæring i 2011.
Forum vs. NBIM
Påstand om mangefull bruk av innflytelse som aksjonær for å fremme høye sosiale og mijlømessige standarder. Klagen ble mottatt i 2012 og avsluttet med slutterklæring i 2013.
Naturvernforbundet m.fl. vs. Cermaq ASA
Påstand om mangelfull involvering av urfolks i Chile og Kanada, manglende respekt for arbeidstakerrettigheter og miljøberedskap ifm rømming av laks fra oppdrettsanlegg. Mottatt i 2009 og avsluttet med avtale i 2011.
Norsk Klimanettverk, Concerned Scientists Norge vs. Statoil ASA
Informasjon om hva saken handler om mangler. Mottatt 2011, avvist i 2012 fordi den handler om Kanadas politikk, ikke Statoils virksomhet.
Rom-flyktninger vs. Kirkens Nødhjelp
Klage på angivelig helseskadelige forhold i flyktningleirer i Kosovo. Mottatt i 2011. Klagen ble avvist, da Kirkens Nødhjelp ikke er et selskap.
Støttekomiteen for Vest-Sahara vs Sjøvik AS
Påstand om brudd på folkeretten gjennom næringsviriksomhet i tilknytning til Vest-Sahara. Mottatt 2011 og partene kom til enighet i 2013.
